The First Years of Life as the Period of Maximum Effectiveness of Neurorehabilitation: Biological Foundations and Practical Approaches
https://doi.org/10.69964/BMCC-2026-3-1-10-21
Abstract
Early pediatric neurorehabilitation is a healthcare priority because it leverages the high neuroplasticity of the brain during the first years of life and helps reduce the risk of persistent motor, cognitive, and behavioral impairments. This paper summarizes the biological determinants of the effectiveness of early interventions (synaptogenesis, myelination, critical periods) and highlights that, in the absence of timely support, neuroplasticity may consolidate ineffcient compensatory strategies, increasing the likelihood of secondary complications. The “first 1000 days” concept is discussed as a clinically meaningful window of opportunity, emphasizing the need to initiate rehabilitation as early as possible after medical stabilization, ensure regular practice, and actively involve the family. We systematize the main groups of children who should be referred to early neurorehabilitation: infants at perinatal risk of central nervous system injury, preterm infants, children with neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital and genetic/metabolic conditions affecting development, sequelae of acquired brain injury, and sensory impairments, as well as children exposed to combined biological and psychosocial risk factors. The paper underscores that effective early intervention requires a multidisciplinary model, continuity of care pathways, and a focus on functional goals.
About the Authors
M. V. PavlichenkoRussian Federation
Maria V. Pavlichenko — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Pediatric Neurorehabilitation, Head of the Scientific Department of Physiology and Pathology of Newborns and Young Children, Pediatrician of the Highest Category of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for the Protection of Mothers and Infants” of the Ministry of Health of Russia.
Repina st., 1, Ekaterinburg, 620028
Tel. cellular: +7 (922) 202-04-08
O. A. Melkozerova
Russian Federation
Oksana A. Melkozerova — МD, Professor, Vice-Rector for Research and Innovation at the Ural State Medical University; Deputy of Director for Science at the Ural Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care.
Repina St., Bldg. 1, Ekaterinburg, 620028; Repina St., Bldg.3, Ekaterinburg, 620028
S. Yu. Zakharova
Russian Federation
Svetlana Yu. Zakharova — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher, Pediatrician of the Highest Category.
Repina st., 1, Ekaterinburg, 620028
Tel: + 7 (912) 667-48-76
A. I. Gaeva
Russian Federation
Alexandra I. Gaeva — Deputy Director for Pediatrics, Anesthesiologist-Resuscitator, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Research Institute for the Protection of Mothers and Infants” of the Ministry of Health of Russia.
Repina St., Bldg. 1, Ekaterinburg, 620028
Tel. +79058340115
Yu. A. Semenov
Russian Federation
Yuri A. Semenov — МD, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Director of the Ural Research Institute of Maternity and Child Care, Ministry of the Public Health of the Russian Federation.
Repina St., Bldg. 1, Ekaterinburg, 620028; Repina St., Bldg.3, Ekaterinburg, 620028
Tel: + 7 (912) 667-48-76
G. B. Malgina
Russian Federation
Galina B. Malgina — PhD, professor, doctor of medical sciences, scientific secretary, leading researcher of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Ural Scientific Research Institute for Maternal and Child Care” of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation.
Repina st., 1, Ekaterinburg, 620028
Tel: 8 (343) 371-08-78
N. V. Bashmakova
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Bashmakova — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher at the Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Obstetrician-Gynecologist of the Ural Federal District.
Repina st., 1, Ekaterinburg, 620028
References
1. Mota-Rojas D., Villanueva-García D., Solimano A. Pathophysiology of Perinatal Asphyxia in Humans and Animal Models. Biomedicines. 2022;10 (2):347. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020347.
2. Popova N.M., Chesnokova L.V. Effectiveness of early intervention in preventing childhood disability in the system of comprehensive rehabilitation and habilitation of young children. Health, demography, ecology of the Finno-Ugric peoples. 2023;4: 35–40.
3. Deng W., Anastasopoulos S., deRegnier R. A. et al. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a year-long (NICU-to-home) evidence-based, high dose physical therapy intervention in infants at risk of neuromotor delay. PLoS One. 2023;18 (9):e0291408. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291408.
4. Pavlinova E.B., Gubich A.A., Savchenko O.A. Strategy of perinatal neuroprotection in children: current state of the problem and prospects. Doctor. Ru. 2024;23 (3):49–54. DOI: 10.31550/1727-2378-2024-23-3-49-54.
5. Orton J, Spittle A, Doyle LW, et al. Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;2024(2):CD005495. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub5.
6. Xin W, Kaneko M, Roth RH, et al. Oligodendrocytes and myelin limit neuronal plasticity in visual cortex. Nature. 2024; 633:856–863.
7. McLaughlin KA, Gabard-Durnam L, et al. Experience-Driven Plasticity and the Emergence of Psychopathology: A Mechanistic Framework Integrating Development and the Environment into the RDoC Model. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2022; 131(6):575–587. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000598
8. Razak A, et al. Early Neurodevelopmental Assessments for Predicting Long-Term Outcomes in Infants at High Risk of Cerebral Palsy. JAMA Netw Open. 2024.
9. Morgan C, Fetters L, Adde L, et al. Early Intervention for Children Aged 0 to 2 Years Withor at High Riskof Cerebral Palsy: International Clinical Practice Guideline Based on Systematic Reviews. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(8):846–858. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0878
10. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Bank Group. Nurturing care for early child-hood development: a framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential. Geneva: WHO; 2018. ISBN 978-92-4-151406-4. https://nurturing-care.org/resources/Nurturing_Care_Framework_en.pdf
11. Bukreeva E.A., Sednenkova T.A., Kalyuzhny A.V., Osipova G.A., Sokolov P.L., Sergienko E.Yu., Chebanenko N.V., Laisheva O.A. Rehabilitation of young children with movement disorders and epilepsy: a rational approach and effectiveness. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology 2022; 16(1): 24–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54101/ACEN.2022.1.3
12. Osmolovskiy D.S., Osmolovskiy S.V., Ovchinnikov A.V., Perelomova O.V. Effciency of complex rehabilitation of young children with perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pacific Medical Journal. 2023;(4):52-56. https://doi.org/10.34215/1609-1175-2023-4-52-56
13. Sidorova I.S., Nikitina N.A., Unanyan A.L., et al. Development of the fetal brain and the influence of prenatal damaging factors on the main stages of neurogenesis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; 22 (1): 3544. DOI: 10.17116/rosakush20222201135
14. Forsyth R, Whyte J. Defining paediatric neurorehabilitation: You cannot improve what you cannot characterize. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024;66(9):1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15919.
15. Prikaz Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 23.10.2019 № 878n “Ob utverzhdenii poryadka organizatsii meditsinskoy reabilitatsii detey” (in Russ.) https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/054/554/original/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B7_%E2%84%96_878%D0%BD_%D0%BE%D1%82_23.10.2019.pdf?1612443239
16. World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization.
17. Young D, Cawood S, Mares K, Duschinsky R, Hardeman W. Strategies supporting parent-delivered rehabilitation exercises to improve motor function after paediatric traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024; 66(7): 836–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15773
18. Golubova TF, Vlasenko SV, Marusich II, Otinov MD, Vlasenko FS, Osmanov EA. Current approaches to the use of robotic devices in rehabilitation complex of children with cerebral palsy. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2023;100(5):36–44. https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort202310005136
19. Krivobokov VN, Borisenko AM, Mingaleva EP. Complex balneotherapy at the stage of spa treatment of children with cerebral palsy. Regenerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digital and Predictive Medicine. 2025;2(3):29–37. https://doi.org/10.17116/rbpdpm2025203129
20. Del Lucchese D, Olivieri I, et al. Telerehabilitation in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1295273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1295273
21. Methodological recommendations on early assistance to children and their families [Electronic resource]. - St. Petersburg: Federal Scientific Center for Rehabilitation and Disabilities named after G. A. Albrecht, 2024. - URL: https://center-albreht.ru/upload/MethodCentre/MR_PO_VOPROSAM_RP_V1.pdf (date of access: 04.02.2026)
22. Nemkova S.A., Boldyrev V.G. Early differential diagnosis and rehabilitation treatment of patients with cerebral palsy. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;124 (1):24–37. DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202412401124
Review
For citations:
Pavlichenko M.V., Melkozerova O.A., Zakharova S.Yu., Gaeva A.I., Semenov Yu.A., Malgina G.B., Bashmakova N.V. The First Years of Life as the Period of Maximum Effectiveness of Neurorehabilitation: Biological Foundations and Practical Approaches. Bulletin of maternal and child care. 2026;3(1):10-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.69964/BMCC-2026-3-1-10-21
JATS XML

